The Vigor in the Initial Stages of Sugarcane Selection
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Vigor is one of the characters valued in the selection of initial stages in sugarcane. The methodology to be followed in its determination has not been specified in Cuba yet; however, vigor determination constitutes the main cause for discrimination in these stages. In order to clarify this problem, a study of the papers published on the work developed in countries having efficient breeding programs such as Australia, Brazil, Colombia and the United States was carried out. This study involved the concept of vigor and its relation to agricultural yield up to its use in early selection stages in a way that would allow updating and optimizing the procedures of the Cuban program for obtaining new cultivars. Further research and specific projects were recommended in order to advance this topic and thus facilitate the implementation of some physiological indicators closely related to agricultural yield and consequently to vigor
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Alvarez, J., Deren, C., & Glaz, B. (2003). Sugarcane Selection for Sucrose and Tonnage Using Economic Criteria. Sugar Cane International Conference, 6-10.
Alvarez, J., Deren, C. W., & Glaz, B. (2004). Sugarcane Selection for Sucrose and Tonnage Using Economic Criteria: FE476/FE476, 5/2004. EDIS, 2004(8).
Brown, A., Daniels, J., & Latter, B. (1969). Quantitative genetics of sugarcane: II. Correlation analysis of continuous characters in relation to hybrid sugarcane breeding. TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 39(1), 1-10.
Bruckner, P., Raymer, P., & Burton, G. (1991). Recurrent phenotypic selection for forage yield in rye. Euphytica, 54(1), 11-17.
Cornide, M. (2018). Bases genéticas y principales métodos del Fitomejoramiento. En M. T. Cornide, Genética, Genómica y Fitomejoramiento: Vol. Tomo 1 (UH, pp. 87-190). Universidad de La Habana, La Habana, Cuba.
Falconer, D. S. (1970). Introducción a la genética cuantitativa. CECSA.
Gallais, A. (2003). Quantitative genetics and breeding methods in autopolyploid plants: Vol. INRA (75338.a ed.). Editions Quae.
Gálvez, G., Ortega, E., Royce, F., & Ferrer, M. (2018). Enfoque metodológico para modelar parámetros y estimar el rendimiento en caña de azúcar por caracteres fisiológicos. Revista Cuba & Caña, 21(1), 39-44.
Gana, K., Shebayan, J., Ogunlela, V., Odion, E., & Imolehin, E. (2009). Path coefficient analysis on growth parameters of chewing sugarcane as affected by fertility rates and weed control treatments at Badeggi, Nigeria. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, 42, 5-9.
Gutiérrez‐Miceli, F., Morales‐Torres, R., De Jesús Espinosa‐Castañeda, Y., Rincón‐Rosales, R., Montes‐Molina, J., Oliva‐Llaven, M., & Dendooven, L. (2004). Effects of partial defoliation on sucrose accumulation, enzyme activity and agronomic parameters in sugar cane (Saccharum spp.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190(4), 256-261.
Hatier, J.-H. B., Faville, M. J., Hickey, M. J., Koolaard, J. P., Schmidt, J., Carey, B.-L., & Jones, C. S. (2014). Plant vigour at establishment and following defoliation are both associated with responses to drought in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Journal of experimental botany, 65(20), 5823-5834.
Hogarth, D. (1987). Genetics of sugarcane. En Sugarcane improvement through breeding (pp. 255-271). Elsevier Amsterdam.
Jorge, H., Jorge, I. M., Mesa, J., & Bernal, N. (2011). Normas y Procedimientos del Programa de Fitomejoramiento de la Caña de Azúcar en Cuba. Boletín Especial Cuba&Caña, 151-153.
Mariotti, J. (1972). Associations among yield and quality components in sugarcane hybrid progenies. Proc Int Soc Sugarcane Tech, 14, 297-302.
Park, S., Jackson, P., Berding, N., & Inman-Bamber, G. (2007). Conventional breeding practices within the Australian sugarcane breeding program. 29, 113-121.
Ramsey, J., & Ramsey, T. S. (2014). Ecological studies of polyploidy in the 100 years following its discovery. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 1-20.
Sandhu, H., Gilbert, R., McCray, J., Perdomo, R., Eiland, B., Powell, G., & Montes, G. (2012). Relationships among leaf area index, visual growth rating, and sugarcane yield. Journal-American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 32, 1-14.
Sattler, M. C., Carvalho, C. R., & Clarindo, W. R. (2016). The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta, 243(2), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2450-x
Simmonds, N., & Walker, D. (1986). An economic selection index for sugar cane breeding. Euphytica, 35(1), 311-317.
Skinner, J. (1967). Grading varieties for selection. 12, 938-949.
Skinner, J. (1972). Section in sugarcane: A review. 14, 149-162.
Skinner, J., Hogarth, D., & Wu, K. (1987). Selection methods, criteria, and indices. En Developments in crop science (Vol. 11, pp. 409-453). Elsevier.
Sreenivasan, T., Ahloowalia, B. S., & Heinz, D. (1987). Cytogenetics. En E. D. J. Heinz, Sugarcane Improvement through Breeding (pp. 211-253).
Stebbins, G. (1971). The morphological, physiological and cytogenetics significance of polyploidy. En G. L. Stebbins, Chromosomal evolution in higher plants (pp. 124-154).
Stebbins, G. L. (1947). Types of polyploids: Their classification and significance. Advances in genetics, 1, 403-429.
Zhao, D., Comstock, J. C., Glaz, B., Edme, S. J., Glynn, N. C., Del Blanco, I., Gilbert, R. A., Davidson, R. W., & Chen, C. Y. (2012). Vigor rating and Brix for first clonal selection stage of the Canal Point sugarcane cultivar development program. Journal of Crop Improvement, 26(1), 60-75.